From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Boze

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2013
NO. CR-S-07-423-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)

Opinion

NO. CR-S-07-423-GEB

01-17-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JEREMY THOMAS BOZE, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692 Acting Federal Public Defender LINDA C. HARTER, Bar #179741 Chief Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant JEREMY THOMAS BOZE


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Public Defender
LINDA C. HARTER, Bar #179741
Chief Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
Attorney for Defendant
JEREMY THOMAS BOZE

AMENDED

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING TRIAL CONFIRMATION AND

JURY TRIAL DATES; EXCLUDING TIME


Date: April 5, 2013

Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, MICHELLE A. PRINCE, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and LINDA C. HARTER, Chief Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for Defendant, that the Trial-Confirmation hearing date of February 1, 2013 and Jury Trial date of February 19, 2013 be vacated, and the matter rescheduled for Trial-Confirmation hearing on April 5, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. and Jury Trial on April 30, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

Additional time is requested for further investigation of the charges, and to accommodate the attorneys' schedules.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including April 5, 2013 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Public Defender

____________

LINDA C. HARTER

Chief Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

JEREMY BOZE

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

____________

MICHELLE A. PRINCE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. For the reasons set forth above, the court finds that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through April 5, 2013.

____________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Boze

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2013
NO. CR-S-07-423-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Boze

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JEREMY THOMAS BOZE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2013

Citations

NO. CR-S-07-423-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)