From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bowles

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 18, 2016
No. 15-11179 (5th Cir. Oct. 18, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-11179

10-18-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. COREY DUANE BOWLES, Defendant-Appellant


Conference Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CR-147-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

The attorney appointed to represent Corey Duane Bowles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bowles has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


Summaries of

United States v. Bowles

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 18, 2016
No. 15-11179 (5th Cir. Oct. 18, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Bowles

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. COREY DUANE BOWLES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 18, 2016

Citations

No. 15-11179 (5th Cir. Oct. 18, 2016)

Citing Cases

Bowles v. United States

His attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and the appeal was…