From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bouler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina
Jan 18, 2012
Case No: DNCW307CR000010-003 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: DNCW307CR000010-003 USM No: 21132-058

01-18-2012

United States of America v. KALEIBA SHONNTA BOULER


Date of Original Judgment: October 30, 2007

Date of Last Amended Judgment: June 9, 2009

Ross Hall Richardson Defendant's Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of [×] the defendant [] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B 1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[×] DENIED. [] GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of ________________ is reduced to ___________

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Original Offense Level: 31 Amended Offense Level: 31

Criminal History Category: III Criminal History Category: III

Original Guideline Range: 135-168 months Amended Guideline Range: 135-168 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

[] The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

[] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.

[] The reduced sentence is above the amended guideline range.

[×] Other (explain): The application of Amendment 750 provides no change in the guideline calculations in this case.

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated October 30, 2007 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Effective Date: ________

(if different from order date)

_____________

Frank D. Whitney

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Bouler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina
Jan 18, 2012
Case No: DNCW307CR000010-003 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Bouler

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. KALEIBA SHONNTA BOULER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

Case No: DNCW307CR000010-003 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2012)