From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Botello-Ortiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2013
NO. 2:13-CR-0021 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 2:13-CR-0021 MCE

03-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADELINA BOTELLO-ORTIZ Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender ANGELES ZARAGOZA Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant ADELINA BOTELLO-ORTIZ BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Angeles Zaragoza for NIRAV DESAI Assistant United States Attorney


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, #87692
Acting Federal Defender
ANGELES ZARAGOZA, #270198
Assistant Federal Defender
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-5700
Attorney for Defendant
ADELINA BOTELLO-ORTIZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING

STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING

TIME


DATE: March 28, 2013

JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

ADELINA BOTELLO-ORTIZ by and through her counsel, ANGELES ZARAGOZA, Assistant Federal Defender, and NIRAV DESAI, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby agree that the status conference set for March 7, 2013, be continued to March 28, 2013, at 9:00 a.m..

This continuance is being requested because defense counsel requires additional time to pursue investigation, await the receipt of pending discovery defense counsel requested from the Tulare County Superior Court and Tehama County Superior Court, and discuss the case with the government.

Specifically, records pertaining to Ms. Botello-Ortiz's priors have been requested along with court transcripts. Defense counsel will communicate with the government before the next status conference to discuss any possible outstanding discovery and to discuss plea negotiations. This continuance is necessary for the ongoing preparation of counsel. The parties anticipate that this case will resolve without the need of a trial.

Counsel, along with the defendants, agree that the time from March 7, 2013 through March 28, 2013, should be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, §§3161(h)(7)(A)and(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, [reasonable time to prepare] and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

_______________

ANGELES ZARAGOZA

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

ADELINA BOTELLO-ORTIZ

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Angeles Zaragoza for

NIRAV DESAI

Assistant United States Attorney

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is continued to , March 28, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., for further Status Conference.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, the period from March 7, 2013 up to and including March 28, 2013, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act due to ongoing preparation of counsel, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Botello-Ortiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2013
NO. 2:13-CR-0021 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Botello-Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADELINA BOTELLO-ORTIZ Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

NO. 2:13-CR-0021 MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)