From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Booth

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 30, 2013
1:09-CV-1689 AWI GSA (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2013)

Opinion


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. VINCENT STEVEN BOOTH, LOUISE Q. BOOTH, MICHAEL SCOTT IOANE, ACACIA CORPORATE MANAGEMENT, LLC, MARIPOSA HOLDINGS, INC., AND ALPHA ENTGERPRISES, LLC, Defendants No. 1:09-CV-1689 AWI GSA United States District Court, E.D. California. July 30, 2013

          ORDER RE: EX PARTE REQUEST FOR ORDER RETURNING OF UNUSED EXHIBIT BINDERS

          ANTHONY ISHII, Senior District Judge.

         The Ioane Group has asked for the return of all unadmitted exhibits in the hands of the United States, the Booths, and the FTB. Doc. 189. The United States opposes the request on the basis that the proceedings are still ongoing and that the unadmitted exhibits may still be relevant as their exclusion in the Motions in Limine order may be the basis of future Ninth Circuit appeal. Doc. 190. The United States's argument is reasonable. Exhibits need not be returned until final judgment in this case becomes final. The Ioane Group's motion is DENIED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Booth

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 30, 2013
1:09-CV-1689 AWI GSA (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Booth

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. VINCENT STEVEN BOOTH, LOUISE Q…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 30, 2013

Citations

1:09-CV-1689 AWI GSA (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2013)