From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bonnett

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Aug 18, 2015
2:13-CR-00210-JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2015)

Opinion

          Kresta Nora Daly, BARTH DALY LLP, Sacramento, California, Attorneys for Defendant DANIEL BONNETT.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER STIPULATION

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through Matthew G. Morris Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant, Daniel Bonnett, through his counsel, Kresta Nora Daly, that sentencing set for September 1, 2015 be vacated. The parties request a new sentencing for October 13, 2015 at 9:15 a.m.

         Probation has been informed of the requested dates and has no objections.

         The parties stipulate that the following will be the new schedule for the filing of objections to the Presentence Report:

1. The Presentence report has been disclosed to counsel.

2. Counsel's written objections to the Presentence Report have been delivered to Probation.

3. The Presentence Report has been filed with the Court and disclosed.

4. Motion for correction of the Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and served on the Probation Officer and Opposing Counsel no later than September 29, 2015.

5. Any replies or statements of non-opposition shall be filed with the Court and served on the Probation Officer and Opposing Counsel no later than October 6, 2015.

          ORDER

         The sentencing date of September 1, 2015 is vacated. The new sentencing date will be October 13, 2015 at 9:15 a.m. The Disclosure Schedule is re-set as follows:

1. The Presentence Report has been disclosed to counsel.

2. Counsel's written objections to the Presentence Report have been served.

3. The Presentence Report has been filed with the Court and disclosed to Counsel.

4. Motion for correction of the Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and Served on the Probation Officer and Opposing Counsel no later than September 29, 2015.

5. Any replies or statements of non-opposition shall be filed with the Court and served on Opposing Counsel no later than October 6, 2015.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bonnett

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Aug 18, 2015
2:13-CR-00210-JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Bonnett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL BONNETT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 18, 2015

Citations

2:13-CR-00210-JAM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2015)