From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bogart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 30, 2012
3:12-0179 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 30, 2012)

Opinion

3:12-0179

10-30-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. DUSTIN B. BOGART, et al., Defendants


Judge Sharp/Brown


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge has entered a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Docket No. 53), recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 35) and Motion for Consolidation (Docket No. 48) be denied. Even though Defendants were specifically informed in the R & R that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days of receipt, no objections have been filed. Having considered the matters presented by the motions and the arguments raised by Defendants, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusion that neither dismissal, nor consolidation is appropriate on this record.

Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:

(1) The R & R (Docket No. 53) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED;

(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 35) is hereby DENIED; and

(3) Defendants' Motion for Consolidation (Docket No. 48) is hereby DENIED.

This case is hereby returned to Magistrate Judge Brown for further pretrial case management.

It is SO ORDERED.

____________________________

KEVIN H. SHARP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Bogart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 30, 2012
3:12-0179 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 30, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Bogart

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. DUSTIN B. BOGART, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 30, 2012

Citations

3:12-0179 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 30, 2012)