From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Blaskis

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Sep 25, 2023
2:13-cr-137 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 25, 2023)

Opinion

2:13-cr-137 2:20-cv-3161

09-25-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NATHANIEL J. BLASKIS, Defendant


Elizabeth P. Deavers, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant/Petitioner filed a Motion to Vacate filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 35) to which the Government Replied (ECF No. 38). The Government agreed that “the motion to vacate should be granted and that a resentencing hearing should be scheduled.” (Resp. at 1, ECF No. 38.) The Court therefore GRANTS Mr. Blaskis' Motion to Vacate. (ECF No. 35.) The Court has since resentenced Mr. Blaskis. (ECF No. 44.) The Clerk is ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of Petitioner in the civil habeas case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Blaskis

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Sep 25, 2023
2:13-cr-137 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 25, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Blaskis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NATHANIEL J. BLASKIS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Sep 25, 2023

Citations

2:13-cr-137 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 25, 2023)