From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Blankenship

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2012
CASE NO. 11-cr-02652-BTM (S.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11-cr-02652-BTM

08-22-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JONATHAN BARTLEY BLANKENSHIP [11], Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:

___ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or
___ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or
× the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or
___ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or
___ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or
___ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;
× of the offense(s) as charged in the Indictment/Information:
21:841(a)(l) and 846; 21:853 - Conspiracy to Distribute Methamphetamine and Cocaine; Criminal Forfeiture (2)
21:841(a)(1); 18:2: 21:853 - Possession of Methamphetamine and Cocaine with Intent to Distribute; Aiding and Abetting; Criminal Forfeiture(3)

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.

______________

Barry Ted Moskowitz

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Blankenship

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2012
CASE NO. 11-cr-02652-BTM (S.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Blankenship

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JONATHAN BARTLEY BLANKENSHIP [11]…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 11-cr-02652-BTM (S.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2012)