From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Benitez-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Aug 21, 2014
CASE NO. 12-20519-CR-LENARD/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Aug. 21, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12-20519-CR-LENARD/GOODMAN

08-21-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RUTILO ALBERTO BENITEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (D.E. 32)

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman ("Report," D.E. 32), issued on July 22, 2014, recommending that the Defendant's Motion for Relief Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), D.E. 26. To date, no objections to the Report have been filed. Failure to timely file objections shall bar parties from attacking on appeal the factual findings contained in the report. See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Therefore, after an independent review of the Report and record, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The Report of the Magistrate Judge (D.E. 32) issued on July 22, 2014, is ADOPTED.



2. The Defendant's Motion is Denied.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 21st day of August, 2014.

/s/_________

JOAN A. LENARD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Benitez-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Aug 21, 2014
CASE NO. 12-20519-CR-LENARD/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Aug. 21, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Benitez-Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RUTILO ALBERTO BENITEZ-RODRIGUEZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Date published: Aug 21, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 12-20519-CR-LENARD/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Aug. 21, 2014)