From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bellamy

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 16, 2012
No. 12-7613 (4th Cir. Nov. 16, 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-7613

11-16-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLAUDE WENDELL BELLAMY, Defendant - Appellant.

Claude Wendell Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:99-cr-00049-F-1) Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Claude Wendell Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Claude Wendell Bellamy appeals the district court's order denying his motion to review findings of historical facts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bellamy, No. 7:99-cr-00049-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Bellamy

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 16, 2012
No. 12-7613 (4th Cir. Nov. 16, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Bellamy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CLAUDE WENDELL BELLAMY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

No. 12-7613 (4th Cir. Nov. 16, 2012)