From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mar 26, 2012
Criminal No. 11-377 (RHK/AJB) (D. Minn. Mar. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal No. 11-377 (RHK/AJB)

03-26-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAMARCO TREASE BELL, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court are Defendant's Objections to the February 6, 2012 Report and Recommendation by United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan, in which Judge Boylan has recommended the denial of Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence as a Result of Search and Seizure be denied.

The undersigned has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and Defendant's Objections thereto. Based upon that review and upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant's Objections (Doc. No. 40) are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 33) is ADOPTED;

3. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED.

__________________

RICHARD H. KYLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mar 26, 2012
Criminal No. 11-377 (RHK/AJB) (D. Minn. Mar. 26, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAMARCO TREASE BELL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Mar 26, 2012

Citations

Criminal No. 11-377 (RHK/AJB) (D. Minn. Mar. 26, 2012)