Opinion
Case No. 3:11CR157-3
03-01-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIELLE BEAVER Defendant.
Judge Thomas M. Rose
FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
OF DEFENDANT DANIELLE BEAVER'S ASSETS
WHEREAS, on September 7, 2012, this Court entered an Agreed Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Doc. 74) ordering the forfeiture, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1) and (2), of the following property:
a. $280.00 U.S. Currency;
WHEREAS, the United States published notice of this forfeiture action and the intent of the United States to dispose of the property in accordance with law, and further notified all parties of their right to petition the Court for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of their alleged interest in the properties, beginning on September 14, 2012 and continuing for at least thirty (30) consecutive days, on the www.forfeiture.gov website; and
WHEREAS, no timely petition has been filed to the property listed above; and
WHEREAS, the Defendant was sentenced and an Amended Judgment was entered on September 14, 2012 and that Judgment ordered the forfeiture of the above-referenced property; and
WHEREAS, the Court finds that defendant had an interest in the property; the United States has established the requisite nexus between the property and the offense; and the United States has established that the property is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1) and (2);
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Agreed Preliminary Order of Forfeiture entered in this action on September 7, 2012 (Doc. 74) ordering the forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §853(a)(1) and (2) of the following property:
a. $280.00 U.S. Currencyis final; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all right, title and interest to the property described above is hereby condemned, forfeited and vested in the United States of America and the United States has clear title to the property described above; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the custodian of the property is hereby authorized to dispose of the property in accordance with the law; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the United States District Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for the purpose of enforcing this Final Order of Forfeiture. SO ORDERED:
________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE