From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bazan

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 28, 2022
No. 21-MJ-00601 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2022)

Opinion

21-MJ-00601

02-28-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTONIO ROJAS BAZAN, aka Antonio Rojas, aka Carlos Contreras, Defendant.


ORDER OF DETENTION

ALKA SAGAR UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

I.

On February 28, 2022, Defendant, assisted by a Spanish language interpreter, made his initial appearance on the criminal complaint filed in this matter by consent to video teleconference. Deputy Federal Public Defender Chad Pennington was appointed to represent Defendant. A detention hearing was held.

[] On motion of the Government [18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)] in a case allegedly involving an offense with maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death.

[X] On motion by the Government or on the Court's own motion [18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)] in a case allegedly involving a serious risk that the defendant will flee.

The Court concludes that the Government is not entitled to a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance as required and the safety or any person or the community [18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2)].

II.

The Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure: [X] the appearance of the defendant as required.

[X] the safety of any person or the community.

III.

The Court has considered: (a) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device; (b) the weight of evidence against the defendant; (c) the history and characteristics of the defendant; and (d) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community. [18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)] The Court also considered all the evidence adduced at the hearing, the arguments of counsel, and the report and recommendation of the U.S. Pretrial Services Agency.

IV.

The Court bases its conclusions on the following:

As to risk of non-appearance:

[X] prior failures to appear
[X] minimal bail resources
[X] Defendant has no legal status in the United States was previously deported from the United States in August 2003, December 2004, September 2006, and July 2009
[X] use of aliases
[X] prior parole violations

Defendant has returned to the United States following his deportation without permission before being found and charged with the instant offense. Thus, Defendant has not demonstrated a willingness to abide by court orders and the Court is not convinced that the defendant will abide by its order to appear for future court appearances if released on bail. Moreover the prospective penalty that defendant faces, if convicted of the charged offense, supports a finding that release on bail will pose a flight risk because defendant will likely be deported after serving the sentence imposed, and the Court finds that, in conjunction with the other factors noted above, this will provide an incentive to flee the jurisdiction.

As to danger to the community:

[X] Defendant's criminal history includes a felony convictions for taking a vehicle without consent, in violation of California Vehicle Code section 10851(a) in the Los Angeles Superior Court in October 2002 and December 2003, for which Defendant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment for one year and four months (October 2002 conviction), and two years imprisonment (December 2003 conviction). Defendant was also convicted, in October 2002, of eluding a pursuing officer, in violation of California Vehicle Code section 2800.2(a).

The Court finds that release on bail would pose a danger to others and to the community.

V.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant be detained until trial. The defendant will be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant will be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel. On order of a Court of the United States or on request of any attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is confined will deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding. [18U.S.C. §3142(i)]


Summaries of

United States v. Bazan

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 28, 2022
No. 21-MJ-00601 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Bazan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTONIO ROJAS BAZAN, aka Antonio…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 28, 2022

Citations

No. 21-MJ-00601 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2022)