From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bautista-Gunter

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Feb 2, 2018
No. 17-50084 (5th Cir. Feb. 2, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-50084

02-02-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORDAN JERICHO BAUTISTA-GUNTER, also known as Jordan Jericho Bautista Gunter, also known as Jordan Bautista Gunter, also known as Jordan Bautista, also known as Jordan Gunter, also known as Forrest Gunter, also known as Jordan J. Burghard Gunter, also known as Forrest Jordan Gunter, also known as Jordan J. Burghard, also known as Jordan Forrest Gunter, also known as Jordan Jordan Burghard Gunter, also known as Forrest J. Gunter, also known as Forrest Jordan Burghard Gunter, Defendant-Appellant


Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:16-CR-176-1 Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

Jordan Jericho Bautista-Gunter appeals his guilty plea convictions for possession of a firearm by a prohibited person and carrying a weapon on an aircraft. He argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because the Government breached its promise, contained in his plea agreement, that it would not oppose his receipt of a U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 adjustment for acceptance of responsibility.

We need not decide whether the Government breached the plea agreement because it cured any breach by making sufficiently clear, both in its amended sentencing memorandum and during Bautista-Gunter's sentencing hearing, its intention to remain silent regarding whether Bautista-Gunter should receive the § 3E1.1 adjustment. See United States v. Purser, 747 F.3d 284, 293-94 (5th Cir. 2014). Although the Government referred during the sentencing hearing to the position expressed in its original sentencing memorandum, the Government's expressions of its intention to remain silent in accordance with the plea agreement were not "equivocal or half-hearted." Id. at 293 n.44.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bautista-Gunter

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Feb 2, 2018
No. 17-50084 (5th Cir. Feb. 2, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Bautista-Gunter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JORDAN JERICHO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 2, 2018

Citations

No. 17-50084 (5th Cir. Feb. 2, 2018)

Citing Cases

United States v. Bautista-Gunter

Importantly, on February 2, 2018, this Court affirmed Bautista-Gunter's appeal of his convictions and…