From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bash

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2023
1:20-cr-00238-JLT-sko (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cr-00238-JLT-sko

09-28-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH BASH, et al., Defendants.


AMENDED ORDER APPOINTING JULIE DE ALMEIDA AS COORDINATING DISCOVERY ATTORNEY

The Court has reviewed the motion for appointment of a Coordinating Discovery attorney filed by Evan Perkins and the supporting evidence. (Doc. 793) The motion has been joined by most of the defendants and no defendant has opposed the motion. Based upon this information, the Court ORDERS that the motion (Doc. 793) is GRANTED. Julie De Almeida is appointed as Coordinating Discovery Attorney for court-appointed defense counsel. The Coordinating Discovery Attorney shall oversee any discovery issues common to all defendants with court-appointed counsel. Her responsibilities will include:

Neither Mr. Armstrong nor Mr. Weaver have responded to the Court's order to join, oppose or file a notice of non-opposition to the motion. (Doc. 795) The Court presumes they do not oppose the motion, considering their silence.

• Managing and, unless otherwise agreed upon with the Government, distributing discovery produced by the Government and relevant third-party information common to defense counsel for all defendants.
• Evaluating the volume and type of discovery to determine what technologies will ensure duplicative costs are avoided and the most efficient and cost-effective methods are identified.
• Acting as a liaison with the United States Attorney's Office to ensure the timely and effective exchange of discovery.
• Identifying, evaluating, and engaging third-party vendors and other litigation support services.
• Assessing the needs of defense counsel and further identifying any additional vendor support that may be required-including copying, scanning, forensic imaging, data processing, data hosting, trial presentation, and other technology depending on the nature of the case.
• Identifying any additional human resources that may be needed by defense counsel for the organization and substantive review of information; and
• Providing training services to the defense teams as a group and individually.

The Coordinating Discovery Attorney's duties do not include providing representation services, and she will not establish an attorney-client relationship with any of the defendants. Discovery intended for counsel of a specific defendant and not to be shared among all defense counsel, shall be produced by the Government directly to defense counsel for that defendant. For discovery common to all defendants (“common discovery”), discovery issues specific to any defendant shall be addressed by defense counsel directly with the Government and not through the Coordinating Discovery Attorney.

For common discovery that has already been produced by the Government prior to this order, the Government shall provide a copy to the Coordinating Discovery Attorney. Additional common discovery not already produced shall be provided directly to the Coordinating Discovery Attorney, who shall duplicate and distribute the discovery to all defense counsel, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. When the Government elects to produce discovery directly to defense counsel, it shall simultaneously provide a copy to the Coordinating Discovery Attorney. The Government shall work with the Coordinating Discovery Attorney to provide discovery in a timely manner.

Her time and the time spent by her staff will be paid by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Defender Services Office. However, the CDA shall petition this Court, ex parte, for funds for outside services. The CDA shall monitor all vendor invoices to confirm the work that was performed. All petitions for outside services shall include a basis for the requested funds and a determination that the costs of the services are reasonable.

The Coordinating Discovery Attorney may also provide this Court with monthly ex parte status reports depicting the status of work and whether that work remains within the budget of any funds authorized by the Court, with a copy provided to defense counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bash

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2023
1:20-cr-00238-JLT-sko (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Bash

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH BASH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2023

Citations

1:20-cr-00238-JLT-sko (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2023)