Opinion
1:22-CR-00213-ADA-BAM
04-07-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES BARRETT, Defendant.
PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney ARIN C. HEINZ Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America
PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney ARIN C. HEINZ Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America
ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET FORTH IN GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE
Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in the government's Request to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following documents to be sealed: (1)Reply to Defendant's Motion in Limine Under Federal Rule of Evidence 413 and the supporting exhibit; and (2) Reply to Defendant's Motion in Limine Under Federal Rule of Evidence 412pertaining to defendant CHARLES BARRETT, and Government's Request to Seal shall be SEALED until further order of this Court.
It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the Government and counsel for the Defendant.
The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publishing Co. v. U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in the Government's request, sealing the Government's motions and exhibits serves a compelling interest.
The Court further finds that disclosure would harm the compelling interests identified by the Government. In light of the public filing of its request to seal, the Court further finds that there are no additional alternatives to sealing the Government's Motions and exhibits that would adequately protect the compelling interests identified by the Government.
IT IS SO ORDERED.