From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Barraza-Macias

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
May 19, 2021
No. 3:12-cr-00392-MO-4 (D. Or. May. 19, 2021)

Opinion

No. 3:12-cr-00392-MO-4

05-19-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CESAR BARRAZA-MACIAS, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, J.,

This matter comes before me on Defendant Cesar Barraza-Macias's Motion to Reduce Sentence [ECF 1274]. Specifically, Mr. Barraza-Macias moves the court for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Mot. to Reduce Sentence [ECF 1274] at 1. In a minute order, I DENIED Mr. Barraza-Macias's motion. [ECF 1285]. I write further here to explain why.

DISCUSSION

Compassionate release is a statutory exception to the rule that a court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). Upon a proper motion, the court may reduce a term of imprisonment if, after considering applicable factors set forth in § 3553(a), the court finds that "extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction" and the reduction is "consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission." 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). A defendant must exhaust administrative remedies before moving the court for compassionate release. Id. The Government concedes that Mr. Barraza-Macias has exhausted his administrative remedies. Gov't Resp. [ECF 1280] at 2.

At this time, however, "the Sentencing Commission has not yet issued a policy statement 'applicable' to § 3582(c)(1)(A) motions filed by a defendant." United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 2021) (per curiam).

Mr. Barraza-Macias argues that he is an appropriate candidate for compassionate release because he suffers from obesity, increasing his risk of serious illness or death from COVID-19. Mot. to Reduce Sentence [ECF 1274] at 1, 7-9. Over a year ago, Mr. Barraza-Macias tested positive for COVID-19, and he "continues to experience symptoms related to his prior COVID-19 infection." Id. at 2. Mr. Barraza-Macias notes "the uncertainty surrounding the lingering effects of COVID-19 and the risk of reinfection" and argues that his "past infection does not remove him from the risk of severe illness." Id.; see also id. at 10-15. He also notes that he has served half his sentence, has performed well while in prison, and has extensive community support. Id. at 2, 15-17.

The Government argues that Mr. Barraza-Macias has not established that an extraordinary and compelling reason warrants a sentence reduction. Gov't Resp. [ECF 1280] at 2-4. The Government provides evidence that Mr. Barraza-Macias was offered the Moderna COVID-19 vaccination but refused it. Gov't Ex. 1 [ECF 1286] at 17, 22. The Government also provides evidence that Mr. Barraza-Macias has received ongoing medical treatment for his symptoms related to his encounter with the virus. Id. at 1-3, 7, 24. Additionally, the Government argues that under the § 3553(a) factors, compassionate release is inappropriate. Gov't Resp. [ECF 1280] at 4-5.

Mr. Barraza-Macias claims that he was sick on the day he was offered the vaccine and declined to receive it on the advice of medical staff. Reply [ECF 1284] at 1-2. He does not suggest that he will never have another opportunity to receive the vaccine. --------

Considering the totality of the briefing and evidence before me, I agree with the Government's position and find that no extraordinary or compelling reason warrants a reduction in Mr. Barraza-Macias's sentence. Mr. Barraza-Macias's argument in favor of release is significantly undercut by the fact that he was offered and refused a vaccine that has so far proven to be highly effective at preventing severe illness and death. See When You've Been Fully Vaccinated, CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated.html (last updated May 16, 2021) ("COVID-19 vaccines are effective at preventing COVID-19 disease, especially severe illness and death."). Separately, Mr. Barraza-Macias does not currently face an inordinate risk of contracting the virus for the second time. According to the CDC, "[c]ases of reinfection with COVID-19 have been reported, but remain rare." Reinfection with COVID-19, CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html (last updated Oct. 27, 2020). Mr. Barraza-Macias is incarcerated at FCI Loretto, which is currently reporting only five active COVID-19 cases among inmates. COVID-19 Update, Fed. Bureau of Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/coronavirus/ (last updated May 18, 2021) (click "Full breakdown and additional details . . ." under "COVID-19 Cases"). And over 350 inmates at the institution have been vaccinated. Id. (click "Learn more about vaccinations and view individual facility stats" under "COVID-19 Vaccine Implementation"). Accordingly, I find that relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) is inappropriate. // // //

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, I DENY Mr. Barraza-Macias's Motion to Reduce Sentence [ECF 1274].

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 19th day of May, 2021.

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Barraza-Macias

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
May 19, 2021
No. 3:12-cr-00392-MO-4 (D. Or. May. 19, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Barraza-Macias

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CESAR BARRAZA-MACIAS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: May 19, 2021

Citations

No. 3:12-cr-00392-MO-4 (D. Or. May. 19, 2021)

Citing Cases

United States v. Newman

Judges in this District as well as other district courts in the Ninth Circuit, however, have declined to…

United States v. Miller

District courts in the Ninth Circuit have, however, found that the refusal of a COVID-19 vaccination…