From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Barragan

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 29, 2015
1:05-cr-00204 AWI-1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2015)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNERR, United States Attorney,

          KATHLEEN A. SERVATIUS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, DAVID M. PORTER, Assistant Federal Defender, Counsel Designated for Service, Sacramento, California, Attorney for Defendant, RAMIRO BARRAGAN.


          STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE

          ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge.

         Defendant, RAMIRO BARRAGAN, by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender David M. Porter, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathleen A. Servatius, hereby stipulate as follows:

         1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o);

         2. On January 16, 2007, this Court sentenced Mr. Barragan to a term of 151 months imprisonment;

         3. His total offense level was 33, his criminal history category was III, and the resulting guideline range was 168 to 210 months, but he received a downward variance;

         4. The sentencing range applicable to Mr. Barragan was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission in Amendment 782, made retroactive on July 18, 2014, see 79 Fed. Reg. 44, 973;

         5. Mr. Barragan's total offense level has been reduced from 33 to 31, and his amended guideline range is 135 to 168 months; and,

         6. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Barragan's term of imprisonment to a total term of 135 months.

          ORDER

         This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the defendant for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

         The parties agree, and the Court finds, that Mr. Barragan is entitled to the benefit Amendment 782, which reduces the total offense level from 33 to 31, resulting in an amended guideline range of 135 to 210 months.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the term of imprisonment imposed in January 2007 is reduced to a term of 135 months.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other terms and provisions of the original judgment remain in effect. The clerk shall forthwith prepare an amended judgment reflecting the above reduction in sentence, and shall serve certified copies of the amended judgment on the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Probation Office.

         Unless otherwise ordered, Mr. Barragan shall report to the United States Probation Office within seventy-two hours after his release.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Barragan

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 29, 2015
1:05-cr-00204 AWI-1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Barragan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAMIRO BARRAGAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 29, 2015

Citations

1:05-cr-00204 AWI-1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2015)