From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Baisden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2013
CASE No. 1:06-cv-01368-AWI-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

CASE No. 1:06-cv-01368-AWI-MJS (PC)

02-13-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LOWELL BAISDEN, Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

PROVIDE THE COURT WITH EXHIBITS

SUPPORTING ITS MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT


(ECF No. 209)


TEN DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff, United States of America, filed the underlying Complaint for Permanent Injunction on September 29, 2006 (Compl., ECF No. 1) pursuant to §§ 7402, 7407, and 7408 of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.).

Plaintiff seeks to permanently bar Defendant Lowell Baisden from (a) promoting any investment, business venture, or other plan or arrangement in connection therewith making false or fraudulent representations about federal tax benefits or treatment, (b) engaging in any other activity subject to penalty under I.R.C. §§ 6700 and 6701, or any other penalty provision in the Internal Revenue Code, (c) preparing, assisting, or filing federal income tax returns, amended returns, and other related documents and forms for others, (d) causing other persons or entities to understate their federal tax liabilities and avoid paying federal taxes, (e) engaging in any other activity subject to penalty under I.R.C. §§ 6694 and 6695, (f) representing anyone before the Internal Revenue Service, and (g) engaging in any other conduct that interferes with the administration or enforcement of the internal revenue laws. (Compl. at 14-15.)

Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, with exhibits in support of its Motion, on August 9, 2012 (Pl. Mot. Summ. J., ECF No. 209; Pl. Ex.'s, ECF No. 211-215.) However, Plaintiff's Motion, and in particular its Statement of Undisputed Facts (Pl. Sep. Stmt., ECF No. 210) relies upon exhibits not in the record or otherwise available to the Court.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff shall, within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, provide courtesy copies of all exhibits not filed in the Electronic Court Filing system to which it refers in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff shall sent the courtesy copies, digitally or by hard copy, to the Court Clerk in Fresno, California. IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Baisden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2013
CASE No. 1:06-cv-01368-AWI-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Baisden

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LOWELL BAISDEN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

CASE No. 1:06-cv-01368-AWI-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)