From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bailey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION
Dec 6, 2011
1:11 CR 10 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 2011)

Opinion

1:11 CR 10

12-06-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff V JAMES W. BAILEY, JR., Defendant.


ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the court pursuant to an Application for Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice (#310) filed by Kirsten Elena Small requesting admission of James D. Galyean. In the application Ms. Small has stated that Mr. Galyean will be representing "16 Sage Automotive Shareholders (Claimants)". Such a description is not sufficient. The application will be denied without prejudice. The court will allow Ms. Small to file an amended application setting forth specifically the names of each one of the clients or claimants Mr. Galyean will be representing in this case.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Application for Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice (#310) is DENIED without prejudice.

Dennis L. Howell

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Bailey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION
Dec 6, 2011
1:11 CR 10 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff V JAMES W. BAILEY, JR., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 6, 2011

Citations

1:11 CR 10 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 2011)