From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bagley

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 8, 2021
18 Cr. 626 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 8, 2021)

Opinion

18 Cr. 626 (NSR)

07-08-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES BAGLEY, Defendant.

AUDREY STRAUSS, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. NICHOLAS BODLEY, Assistant United States Attorney. CHARLES BAGLEY, ANDREW G. PATEL, ESQ., Attorney for Defendant.


AUDREY STRAUSS, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York.

NICHOLAS BODLEY, Assistant United States Attorney.

CHARLES BAGLEY, ANDREW G. PATEL, ESQ., Attorney for Defendant.

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT

THE HONORABLE NELSON S. ROMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

WHEREAS, on or about August 30, 2018, CHARLES BAGLEY (the “Defendant”), was charged in a one-count Information, 18 Cr. 626 (NSR) (the “Information”), with conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count One);

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(7), of any and all property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information;

WHEREAS, on or about August 30, 2018, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to, inter alia, Title 18, United States Code, Section 982 a sum of money representing proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information (the “Money Judgment”);

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $32, 076.36 in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained can not be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Audrey Strauss, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney, Nicholas Bradley, of counsel, and the Defendant, and his counsel, Andrew G. Patel, Esq., that:

1. Asa result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $32, 076.36 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, CHARLES BAGLEY, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith. '

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

8. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Bagley

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 8, 2021
18 Cr. 626 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 8, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Bagley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES BAGLEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 8, 2021

Citations

18 Cr. 626 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 8, 2021)