From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bagdasarian

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2015
1:11-CR-00352-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2015)

Opinion

          KEVIN P. ROONEY Assistant United States Attorney

          ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI Attorney for MARK BAGDASARIAN

          CHARLES LEE Attorney for RYAN BAGDASARIAN


          STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER

          Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record, that the Status Conference, presently set for January 26, 2015, at 8:30 a.m., be continued to April 27, 2015, at 8:30 a.m.

         Counsel for Mark Bagdasarian and Ryan Bagdasarian and Assistant United States Attorney Kevin Rooney are working on a resolution of this case, but need additional time, until at least April 27, 2015, to resolve this case or set a trial date.

         Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing this status conference as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.

         For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of January 26, 2015, through April 27, 2015, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant’s request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

         ORDER

         IT IS SO ORDERED. Good cause having been shown, the Status Conference set for January 26, 2015, is hereby continued to April 27, 2015, at 8:30 a.m. Additionally, time shall be excluded by stipulation from the parties and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Bagdasarian

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 26, 2015
1:11-CR-00352-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Bagdasarian

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARK BAGDASARIAN AND RYAN…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 26, 2015

Citations

1:11-CR-00352-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2015)