From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Auston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 29, 2013
Case No. 3:04-cr-130 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:04-cr-130

08-29-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD AUSTON, Defendant.


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 381), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired on August 19, 2013, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence be DENIED. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Defendant is denied a certificate of appealability and the Court certifies to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous.

________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Auston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 29, 2013
Case No. 3:04-cr-130 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 29, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Auston

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD AUSTON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Aug 29, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:04-cr-130 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 29, 2013)