From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 6, 2013
Case No.: 2:11-CR-276 JAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:11-CR-276 JAM

02-06-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JONATHAN AUSTIN, Defendant.

CLYDE M. BLACKMON (SBN 36280) ROTHSCHILD WISHEK & SANDS LLP Attorneys for Defendant, JONATHAN AUSTIN


CLYDE M. BLACKMON (SBN 36280)
ROTHSCHILD WISHEK & SANDS LLP
Attorneys for Defendant,
JONATHAN AUSTIN

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING JUDGMENT AND

SENTENCE AND REVISING SENTENCING SCHEDULE

The United States of America, through its counsel Assistant United States Attorney Jason S. Hitt, and defendant Jonathan Austin, through his counsel Clyde M. Blackmon, stipulate that the date for imposition of judgment and sentence upon Mr. Austin be continued to March 12, 2013, and that the sentencing schedule pertaining to the preparation, objections to, and filing of the Presentence Report in the matter be revised as follows.

• Judgment and Sentencing date: March 12, 2013 at 9:45 a.m.
• Reply, or Statement of Non-Opposition: March 5, 2013
• Motion for Correction of the Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and served on the Probation Officer
and opposing counsel no later than: February 26, 2013
• The Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and disclosed to counsel no later than: February 19, 2013
• Counsel's written objections to the Presentence Report shall be delivered the Probation Officer and opposing counsel no later than: February 12, 2013

It is necessary to continue the date for imposition of judgment and sentence and to revise the sentencing schedule because the preparation of the Presentence Report was delayed. As a result, counsel for Mr. Austin was not able to review the report and timely comply with the previous sentencing schedule in the preparation of his written objections.

United States Probation Officer Lynda M. Moore has been advised of the necessity to continue the sentencing date and revision of the sentencing schedule; she has no objection to the granting of the proposed order.

Therefore, the parties request that the imposition of judgment and sentence in this matter, currently set for February 26, 2013, be continued to 9:45 a.m. on March 12, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

By: Clyde M. Blackmon for

JASON HITT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ROTHSCHILD WISHEK & SANDS LLP

By: ______________________

CLYDE M. BLACKMON

Attorneys for Defendant

JONATHAN AUSTIN

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING upon the stipulation of the parties the imposition of judgment and sentence in this matter presently scheduled for February 26, 2013, is continued to March 12, 2013, at 9:45 a.m., and the sentencing schedule is revised as follows.

• Judgment and Sentencing date: March 12, 2013 at 9:45 a.m.
• Reply, or Statement of Non-Opposition: March 5, 2013
• Motion for Correction of the Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and served on the Probation Officer and opposing counsel no later than: February 26, 2013
• The Presentence Report shall be filed with the Court and disclosed to counsel no later than: February 19, 2013
• Counsel's written objections to the Presentence Report shall be delivered the Probation Officer and opposing counsel no later than: February 12, 2013
IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 6, 2013
Case No.: 2:11-CR-276 JAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JONATHAN AUSTIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 6, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:11-CR-276 JAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2013)