From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ask

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 13, 2024
24-cr-25 (ECT/TNL) (D. Minn. Jun. 13, 2024)

Opinion

24-cr-25 (ECT/TNL)

06-13-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Jon Michael Ask, Defendant.

Plaintiff: David Classen, Assistant U.S. Attorney Defendant: Jon Michael Ask, pro se Defense standby counsel: Steven J. Wright, CJA


Date: June 13, 2024

Court Reporter: Audio

Courthouse: Minneapolis

Courtroom: 9W

Time Commenced: 10:16 a.m.

Time Concluded: 10:34 a.m.

Sealed Hearing Time: 10:17 a.m. - 10:26 a.m.

Time in Court: 18 Minutes

Hearing Type: Oral Argument

Plaintiff: David Classen, Assistant U.S. Attorney

Defendant: Jon Michael Ask, pro se

Defense standby counsel: Steven J. Wright, CJA

BEFORE: Tony N. Leung U.S. Magistrate Judge

CRIMINAL MOTION HEARING

Tony N. Leung, United States District Magistrate Judge

[] ORDER TO BE ISSUED [X] NO ORDER TO BE ISSUED [] R&R TO BE ISSUED [X] NO R&R TO BE ISSUED

[] Exhibits retained by the Court [] Exhibits returned to counsel

Other Remarks:

For the reasons stated on the record, which are expressly incorporated herein by reference, pro se Defendant's Motions to Appoint Counsel, ECF Nos. 35 and 36, were granted. Standby counsel Steven Wright was appointed as counsel for Defendant. Defendant and defense counsel adopted the previously filed pretrial motions found at ECF Nos. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26.

With no objection by the Government, Defendant moved for an additional week from today to consider filing additional pretrial motions or to amend the previously filed motions due to the substantial amount of discovery defense counsel has been provided with in relation to this matter. Defense counsel represented that he is working diligently to review the evidence but needs more time to review the discovery and to decide whether to file any additional motions. Defendant also requested exclusion under the Speedy Trial Act, which the Court granted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h).

Although the Court granted on the record Defendant's one-week extension request and the Government's request for a one-week response deadline, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h), this Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial, and such continuance is necessary to provide the parties and their counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation and to make efficient use of the parties' resources. Therefore, the Court finds appropriate and with good cause a two-week extension of Defendant's motions filing deadline as well as a two-week response deadline for the Government

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendant's Motions to Appoint Counsel, ECF Nos. 35 and 36, are GRANTED.

2. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, Steven J. Wright, Attorney ID 387336, is appointed as counsel for Defendant.

3. The previously filed pretrial motions, ECF Nos. 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, are adopted by Defendant.

4. The period of time from now through June 27, 2024, shall be excluded from Speedy Trial Act computations in this case.

5. All motions in the above-entitled case shall be filed and served consistent with Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 12(b) and 47 on or before June 27, 2024. D. Minn. LR 12.1(c)(1). Two courtesy copies of all motions and responses shall be delivered directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung.

6. Counsel shall electronically file a letter on or before June 27, 2024, if no motions will be filed and there is no need for a hearing.

7. All responses to motions shall be filed by July 11, 2024. D. Minn. LR 12.1(c)(2).

8. Any Notice of Intent to Call Witnesses shall be filed by July 11, 2024. D. Minn. LR 12.1(c)(3)(A).

9. Any Responsive Notice of Intent to Call Witnesses shall be filed by July 15, 2024. D. Minn. LR 12.1(c)(3)(B).

10. A motions hearing will be held pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 12(c) where:

a. The Government makes timely disclosures, and a defendant pleads particularized matters for which an evidentiary hearing is necessary; or
b. Oral argument is requested by either party in its motion, objection or response pleadings.

11. If required and subject to further order of the Court, the motions hearing shall be heard before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on July 30, 2024, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 9W, Diana E. Murphy U.S. Courthouse, 300 South Fourth Street, MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota 55415. D. Minn. LR 12.1(d).

12. The trial date, and other related dates, will be scheduled at a date and time to be determined before District Judge Eric C. Tostrud.


Summaries of

United States v. Ask

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 13, 2024
24-cr-25 (ECT/TNL) (D. Minn. Jun. 13, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Ask

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Jon Michael Ask, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 13, 2024

Citations

24-cr-25 (ECT/TNL) (D. Minn. Jun. 13, 2024)