From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Arellano-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2013
2:10-CR-00390-WBS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2013)

Opinion

2:10-CR-00390-WBS

02-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO ARELLANO-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JUSTIN L. LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
JUSTIN L. LEE
Assistant U.S. Attorney

AMENDED STIPULATION, JOINT

REQUEST TO REORDER COMMITMENT

FOR COMPETENCY EVALUATION, and

PROPOSED ORDER


Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb


STIPULATION

The United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, and the defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On October 31, 2012, the Honorable Edward J. Garcia ordered that the defendant be committed to the care of the Attorney General to a suitable facility so that a competency evaluation could be performed. (Doc. 42.) The Order set out that a competency report would be submitted to the parties by January 31, 2013, and that matter was set for hearing on February 15, 2013.
2. On November 30, 3012, following Judge Garcia's retirement, this matter was reassigned to the Honorable William B. Shubb. (Doc. 43.)
3. The United States Marshals Service did not receive a copy of Judge Garcia's October 31, 2012 Order. Therefore, the defendant was never transferred to an appropriate facility for preparation of a competency evaluation and no competency report was prepared.
4. The factual basis and need for a competency evaluation that supported Judge Garcia's October 31, 2012 Order remains true today. Accordingly, the parties request that the Court reinstitute Judge Garcia's October 31, 2012 Order.
5. On February 20, 2013, the parties were informed that the United States Marshals Service will be able to place the defendant at the Federal Medical Center at Butner Federal Correctional Complex by March 14, 2013.
6. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court order the following:
a. the defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for treatment in a suitable facility for such a reasonable time, not to exceed four months, as is necessary to determine whether there is a substantial probability that the defendant will attain capacity to permit the proceedings to go forward;
b. the director of such facility shall submit a report regarding the defendant's competency to counsel and the Court by June 28, 2013;
c. time is excluded from February 21, 2013, through July 15, 2013, pursuant 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(A) (Local Code A) and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(4) (Local Code N); and
d. this matter is set for a status conference on July 15, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

____________________

JUSTIN L. LEE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

____________________

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

(as authorized on Feb. 14 and 20, 2013)

ORDER

Upon consideration of the above stipulation and request, the Court hereby ORDERS that:

a. the defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for treatment in a suitable facility for such a reasonable time, not to exceed four months, as is necessary to determine whether there is a substantial probability that the defendant will attain capacity to permit the proceedings to go forward;
b. the director of such facility shall submit a report regarding the defendant's competency to counsel and the Court by June 28, 2013;
c. time is excluded from February 21, 2013, through July 15, 2013, pursuant 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(A) (Local Code A) and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(4) (Local Code N);
d. this matter is set for a status conference on July 15, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.; and
e. the United States Attorney shall forthwith deliver a copy of this Order to the United States Marshal for this District.

____________________

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Arellano-Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 22, 2013
2:10-CR-00390-WBS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Arellano-Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO ARELLANO-RODRIGUEZ…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 22, 2013

Citations

2:10-CR-00390-WBS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2013)