See Gibbs, 383 U.S. at 726 ("Needless decisions of state law should be avoided both as a matter of comity and to promote justice between the parties, by procuring for them a surer-footed reading of the applicable law."). Defendants rely heavily on K.I.D. v. Jones, Civ. No. 3:14-cv-177-JAG (E.D. Va. April 8, 2014), aff'd sub nom., K.I.D. v. Wilkins, 599 F. App'x 118, 118 (4th Cir. 2015) (mem.). K.I.D., however, actually supports remand in this case. Of particular import, while defendants are correct that the Fourth Circuit agreed that "remand would not have served the interest of judicial economy," defendants ignore that the Fourth Circuit based its conclusion heavily on the "significant action [that] had taken place in federal court prior to filing of the [remand] motion."