From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Anderson

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 15, 2021
S119 Cr. 771 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2021)

Opinion

S119 Cr. 771 (VB)

07-15-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. HAKIM ANDERSON, Defendant.

AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Shiva H. Logarajah Assistant United States Attorney HAKIM ANDERSON RUTH LIEBESMAN, Esq. Attorney tor Defendant


AUDREY STRAUSS

United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York

Shiva H. Logarajah

Assistant United States Attorney

HAKIM ANDERSON

RUTH LIEBESMAN, Esq.

Attorney tor Defendant

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT

VINCENT L. BRICCETTI JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about March 8, 2021, HAKIM ANDERSON, a/k/a “Hak” (the “Defendant”) was charged in a one-count Superseding Information SI 19 Cr. 771 (VB) (the “Information”) with narcotics conspiracy, in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(b)(1)(B) and 846 (Count One);

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, of any and all property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, and any and all property used or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Information;

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $1, 440 in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Audrey Strauss, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney, Shiva H. Logarajah, of counsel, and the Defendant, and his counsel, Ruth Liebesman, Esq., that:

1. Asa result of the offense charged in Count One of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $1, 440 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”) representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Information, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, HAKIM ANDERSON, a/k/a “Hak, ” and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

8. The Clerk of the Court shall forward three certified copies of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment to Assistant United States Attorney Alexander J. Wilson, Co-Chief of the Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, United States Attorney's Office, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007.

9. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Anderson

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 15, 2021
S119 Cr. 771 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. HAKIM ANDERSON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 15, 2021

Citations

S119 Cr. 771 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2021)