From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Anacleto-Estrada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 22, 2012
NO. 3:12-mj-4069 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 22, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3:12-mj-4069

10-22-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARIA M. ANACLETO-ESTRADA


ORDER

Defendant Anacleto-Estrada filed her "Emergency Motion To Preserve Certain Testimony And Physical Evidence For Trial" (Docket Entry No. 10). By this motion, defendant seeks an order requiring the Government to preserve certain testimony and physical evidence for trial.

Since the filing of defendant's motion, it appears that the Government has sought and obtained material witness warrants for 18 individuals believed to be the subject of defendant's motion (Docket Entry No. 3:12-mj-4073).

From the foregoing, the undersigned Magistrate Judge finds that defendant's need for the testimony of these material witnesses, as well as their identities, has been addressed. The Court further finds that defendant's request for the physical evidence (dashboard camera video and recordings of 9-1-1 calls) should be governed by the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, defendant's motion is DENIED as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

JOHN S. BRYANT

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Anacleto-Estrada

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 22, 2012
NO. 3:12-mj-4069 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 22, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Anacleto-Estrada

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARIA M. ANACLETO-ESTRADA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 22, 2012

Citations

NO. 3:12-mj-4069 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 22, 2012)