From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. an

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 4, 2013
CASE NO.: CASE NO.: 10-cr-168 JAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: CASE NO.: 10-cr-168 JAM

04-04-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOB AN, Defendant

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney TODD LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney RON PETERS Attorney for Defendant Bob An


Law Offices of Ron Peters
RON PETERS (SBN: 45749)
50 Fullerton Court, Suite 207
Sacramento, California 95825
Telephone: (916) 922-9270
Facsimile: (916) 922-2465
Email: ronslaw207@sbcglobal.net
Attorney for Defendant
BOB AN

STIPULATION AND

ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING

FROM APRIL 9, 2013 TO APRIL 30, 2013

The United States of America, through its counsels of record, Benjamin B. Wagner, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and Todd Leras, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant Bob An, through his attorney, Ronald Peters, Esq, hereby stipulate and agree that the judgment and sentencing hearing scheduled for April 9, 2013, at 9:45 am should be continued to April 30, 2013 at 9:45 a.m.

The defendant requires additional time to address issues relating to safety vale eligibility

Parties agree that time should be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), and Local Code T-4 - reasonable time to prepare and for continuity of counsel. The parties agree that time be excluded under this provision from April 9, 2013, to and including April 30, 2013.

Respectfully Submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

___________

TODD LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

___________

RON PETERS

Attorney for Defendant

Bob An

ORDER FINDING EXCUSABLE TIME

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying stipulation and declaration of counsel, the status conference in the above-entitled action is continued to April 9, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. The court finds excusable time in this matter from April 9, 2013 through April 30, 2013 under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, to allow continuity of counsel and to allow reasonable time necessary for effective presentation. For the reasons stipulated by the parties, the Court finds that the interest of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(8)(A), (h)(8)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED

___________

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. an

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 4, 2013
CASE NO.: CASE NO.: 10-cr-168 JAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. an

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOB AN, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 4, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.: CASE NO.: 10-cr-168 JAM (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2013)