From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alvarado

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 6, 2013
Cr.S. 11-134-JAM (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

          JOSEPH SCHLESINGER>, Bar# 87692 Acting Federal Defender, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Bar# 237432 Assistant Federal Defender, Sacramento, California, Attorney for Defendant JOSE MEDRANO


          AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through, MICHAEL BECKWITH, Assistant U.S. Attorney, defendant, JOSE MEDRANO by and through his counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Tuesday, May 7, 2013, be continued to Tuesday, May 14, 2013, at 9:45 a.m.

         The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case. Defendant Jose Medrano and his attorney have been in negotiations with the government and are close to reaching an agreement. Counsel for Mr. Medrano anticipates that by the requested court date, May 14, Mr. Medrano will be prepared to enter a change of plea.

         The parties agree that the requested continuance is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The parties agree that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, and they ask the Court to exclude time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act from the date of this stipulation, May 3, 2013, through May 14, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4, pertaining to reasonable time for defense preparation.

          ORDER

         The Court having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the parties' stipulation as its order in its entirety. It is ordered that the status conference presently set for May 7, 2013, be continued to May 14, 2013, at 9:45 a.m. The Court hereby finds that the requested continuance is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

         It is ordered that time from the date of the parties' stipulation, May 3, 2013, up to and including, the May 14, 2013, status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4 (allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Alvarado

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 6, 2013
Cr.S. 11-134-JAM (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Alvarado

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JUAN LOPEZ ALVARADO et al…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

Cr.S. 11-134-JAM (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)