From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Altit

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 10, 2013
2:12-cr-00303-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2013)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Bar No. 122664 Federal Defender, BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar No. 214897 Assistant Federal Defender, Sacramento, California, Attorneys for Defendant MORDECHAY ALTIT.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney, LEE SAARA BICKLEY, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR MORDECHAY ALTIT CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE IN BOTH MATTERS TO JULY 19, 2013 AND EXCLUDING TIME

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.

         It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through LEE BICKLEY, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, MORDECHAY ALTIT, by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Friday, June 21, 2013 in action 2:12-cr-00303-GEB be continued to Friday, July 19, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. It is further stipulated that the status conference set for Friday, June 14, 2013 in action 2:12-cr-00389-GEB be continued to Friday, July 19, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. as to MORDECHAY ALTIT only.

         These matters were recently related and action 2:12-cr-00389-GEB was reset to June 14, 2013 for MORDECHAY ALTIT only. Counsel for Defendant MORDECHAY ALTIT is unavailable on June 14, 2013 due to a mandatory furlough. This continuance is requested for continuity of counsel and to allow defense counsel additional time to prepare, to conduct ongoing investigation of the facts, and to work toward resolution of these cases.

         The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuances outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

         In action 2:12-cr-00303-GEB, speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for July 19, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

         In action 2:12-cr-389-GEB, speedy trial time is to be excluded from June 13, 2013 through the date of the status conference set for July 19, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

          ORDER

         The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in these cases would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuances outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

         The Court orders that the status conference set for Friday, June 21, 2013 in action 2:12-cr-00303-GEB be continued to Friday, July 19, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. It is further ordered that the status conference set for Friday, June 14, 2013 in action 2:12-cr-00389-GEB be continued to Friday, July 19, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. as to MORDECHAY ALTIT only.

         The Court orders that, in action 2:12-cr-00303-GEB, speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for July 19, 2013, and, in action 2:12-cr-389-GEB, speedy trial time is to be excluded from June 13, 2013 through the date of the status conference set for July 19, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

         IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Altit

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 10, 2013
2:12-cr-00303-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Altit

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MORDECHAY ALTIT, Defendant. UNITED…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 10, 2013

Citations

2:12-cr-00303-GEB (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2013)