From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2012
CASE NO. 12CR0516-H (S.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12CR0516-H

03-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. ROBERT NATHAN ALM, Defendant


JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:

X an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or
_ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or
_ the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal, without prejudice; or
_ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or
_ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or
_ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;
X of the offense(s) as charged in the Indictment/Information:
18:2113(a) and 2113(d)- Armed Bank Robbery; 18:924(cl (l)=Use and Carrying of a Firearm During the Commission of a Crime of Violence

IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.

____________

JAN M. ADLER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Alm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2012
CASE NO. 12CR0516-H (S.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Alm

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. ROBERT NATHAN ALM, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 12CR0516-H (S.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)