From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alfred

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-CR-160 LJO (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-CR-160 LJO

02-11-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DIAMANTE ALFRED Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney ELANA S. LANDAU Assistant U.S. Attorney


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
ELANA S. LANDAU
Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

EXCLUDE TIME

The parties request that the jury trial in this case be continued from March 26, 2013 to May 21, 2013 at 8:30a.m.. They stipulate that the time between March 26, 2013 and May 21, 2013 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties further request that the trial confirmation and motions hearing currently set for February 25, 2013 be continued to May 6, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Specifically, the Court has indicated that the current jury trial date is unavailable due to Ninth Circuit obligations, and May 21, 2013 is the first available date for defense counsel to be available and adequately prepared. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully Submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: _________________

ELANA S. LANDAU

Assistant U.S. Attorney

_________________

ROGER K. LITMAN

Attorney for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Alfred

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-CR-160 LJO (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Alfred

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DIAMANTE ALFRED Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-CR-160 LJO (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)