From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 20, 2012
No. 3:12-00165 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-00165

11-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERIC ALEXANDER, Defendant.


Chief Judge Haynes


ORDER

For the reasons stated in open court, Defendant's motion (Docket Entry No. 27) is DENIED. The Court further finds and concludes that given the permanent alteration of the Defendant's vehicle, the Defendant's staleness contention lacks merit.

It is so ORDERED.

______________

WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR.

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 20, 2012
No. 3:12-00165 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 20, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERIC ALEXANDER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 20, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-00165 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 20, 2012)