From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ajoku

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 23, 2014
584 F. App'x 824 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 11-50230

09-23-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KELECHI AJOKU, aka Kelechi Ajouku, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-01094-WDK-5 MEMORANDUM On Remand From The United States Supreme Court Argued and Submitted September 16, 2014 San Francisco, California Before: GOODWIN, HAWKINS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Kelechi Ajoku ("Ajoku") was convicted of four counts of making a false statement relating to a health care benefit program under 18 U.S.C. § 1035. On appeal, Ajoku challenges the district court's jury instruction on the statute's "willfulness" mental state element. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand for a new trial.

As conceded by the government in its opposition brief to Ajoku's petition for certiorari, the district court erred by giving an instruction on the element of "willfulness" that does not comply with Bryan v. United States. See 524 U.S. 184, 191-92 (1998) ("As a general matter, when used in the criminal context, a willful act is one undertaken with a bad purpose. In other words, in order to establish a willful violation of a statute, the Government must prove that the defendant acted with knowledge that his conduct was unlawful." (footnote and internal quotation marks omitted)). It is thus undisputed that Ajoku's jury received an erroneous instruction.

We apply harmless-error analysis to cases involving improperly instructed juries on a single element of the offense. See Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 9-10 (1999). On the record before us, we are unable to conclude that it is "clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found [Ajoku] guilty" of the charges had it been properly instructed. Id. at 18. We therefore reverse and remand for a new trial or other proceedings consistent with this disposition.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ajoku

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Sep 23, 2014
584 F. App'x 824 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Ajoku

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KELECHI AJOKU, aka…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 23, 2014

Citations

584 F. App'x 824 (9th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Mazzeo

In response, the government argues that the court's jury instruction was consistent with Ninth Circuit…

Shin v. United States

In a second decision (Ajoku II), the Ninth Circuit noted that, “[a]s conceded by the government in its…