From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ailport

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 6, 2012
Criminal No. 90-69(1)(DSD) (D. Minn. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Criminal No. 90-69(1)(DSD)

07-06-2012

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Dale Edward Ailport, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the court upon the motion for furlough or to set aside sentence by defendant Dale Edward Ailport. Defendant is a federal inmate serving a 360-month sentence for aiding and abetting distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He seeks a five-day, temporary release to visit his sister, who has been diagnosed with stage-IV lung cancer.

Defendant argues that the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, empowers the court to grant a furlough or temporarily set aside a sentence. However, Congress vests authority to grant furloughs in the Bureau of Prisons. 18 U.S.C. § 3622(a). "Where a statute specifically addresses the particular issue at hand, it is that authority, and not the All Writs Act, that is controlling." Bania v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-2212, 2011 WL 882096, at *3 (D. Minn. Feb. 24, 2011) (quoting Penn. Bureau of Corr. v. U.S. Marshals Serv., 474 U.S. 34, 43 (1985)). In the present case, 28 U.S.C. § 3622 controls. Therefore, defendant must seek his temporary release from the Bureau of Prisons. The court will send notice of the request to the warden at FPC Duluth.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion [ECF No. 78] is denied.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

______________________

David S. Doty, Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Ailport

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jul 6, 2012
Criminal No. 90-69(1)(DSD) (D. Minn. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Ailport

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Dale Edward Ailport, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

Criminal No. 90-69(1)(DSD) (D. Minn. Jul. 6, 2012)