Opinion
No. CR-S-11-365-GEB
04-18-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE AGUILAR-MADRIZ, Defendants.
PRECILIANO MARTINEZ Attorney for Defendant Jose Aguilar-Madriz JOHN R. MANNING Attorney for Defendant Ronald Reeves DAN F. KOUKOL Attorney for Defendant Artemio Aguilar CARL E. LARSON Attorney for Defendant Juan Silva J TONEY Attorney for Defendant Salvador Silva MICHAEL B. BIGELOW Attorney for Defendant David Martinelli SCOTT N. CAMERON Attorney for Defendant Gregorio Zapien-Mendoza HAYES H. GABLE Attorney for Defendant Gabino Cuevas-Hernandez CLEMENTE JIMENEZ Attorney for Defendant Moses Puledo Aguilar ERIN J. RADEKIN Attorney for Defendant Adan Guitierrez Cruz KYLE R. KNAPP Attorney for Defendant Manuel Madriz Sanchez OLAF W. HEDBERG Attorney for Defendant Pedro Aguilar Aguilar Benjamin B. Wagner United States Attorney JUSTIN LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney
JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874)
ATTORNEY AT LAW
1111 H Street, # 204
Sacramento, CA. 95814
(916) 444-3994
Fax (916) 447-0931
Attorney for Defendant
RONALD REEVES
STIPULATION REGARDING
EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS
UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT;
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER
Date: June 21, 2013
Judge: Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
The United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Justin Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Jose Aguilar-Madriz, Preciliano Martinez, Esq., counsel for defendant Ronald Reeves, John R. Manning, Esq., counsel for defendant Artemio Aguilar, Dan F. Koukol, Esq., counsel for defendant Juan Silva, Carl E. Larson, Esq., counsel for defendant Salvador Silver, J Toney, Esq., counsel for defendant David Martinelli, Michael B. Bigelow, Esq., counsel for defendant Gregorio Zapien-Mendoza, Scott N. Cameron, Esq., counsel for defendant Gabino Cuevas-Hernandez, Hayes H. Gable, III, Esq., counsel for defendant Moses Puledo Aguilar, Clemente M. Jimenez, Esq., counsel for defendant Adam Gutierrez Cruz, Erin J. Radekin, Esq., counsel for defendant Manuel Madriz Sanchez, Kyle R. Knapp, Esq., and counsel for defendant Pedro Aguilar Aguilar, Olaf W. Hedberg, Esq., hereby stipulate the following:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status conference on April 19, 2013.
2. By this stipulation, the defendants now move to continue the status conference until June 21, 2013 and to exclude time between April 19, 2013 and June 21, 2013 under the Local CodeT-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare).
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request the Court find the following:
a. Counsel for the defendants need additional time to review the discovery, conduct investigation, and continue negotiations with prosecution in an effort to reach a resolution.
b. Currently the discovery in this case includes 129 pages and two video DVDs.
c. Counsel for the defendants believe the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
d. The Government does not object to the continuance.
e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) within which trial must commence, the time period of April 19, 2013 to June 21, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4 because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request
on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
________________________
PRECILIANO MARTINEZ
Attorney for Defendant
Jose Aguilar-Madriz
________________________
JOHN R. MANNING
Attorney for Defendant
Ronald Reeves
________________________
DAN F. KOUKOL
Attorney for Defendant
Artemio Aguilar
________________________
CARL E. LARSON
Attorney for Defendant
Juan Silva
________________________
J TONEY
Attorney for Defendant
Salvador Silva
________________________
MICHAEL B. BIGELOW
Attorney for Defendant
David Martinelli
________________________
SCOTT N. CAMERON
Attorney for Defendant
Gregorio Zapien-Mendoza
________________________
HAYES H. GABLE
Attorney for Defendant
Gabino Cuevas-Hernandez
________________________
CLEMENTE JIMENEZ
Attorney for Defendant
Moses Puledo Aguilar
________________________
ERIN J. RADEKIN
Attorney for Defendant
Adan Guitierrez Cruz
________________________
KYLE R. KNAPP
Attorney for Defendant
Manuel Madriz Sanchez
________________________
OLAF W. HEDBERG
Attorney for Defendant
Pedro Aguilar Aguilar
Benjamin B. Wagner
United States Attorney
by: ________________________
JUSTIN LEE
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.
________________________
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE