Opinion
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Robert E. Coyle, Senior Judge, Presiding.
Kathleen A. Servatius, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Alejandro Aguilar-Espinoza, Clayton, CA, pro se.
Before O'SCANNLAIN, RYMER and BEA, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Alejandro Aguilar-Espinoza appeals the district court's denial of his motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal.
The district court properly construed Aguilar-Espinoza's notice of appeal as a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal and denied it, because Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4) prohibits the district court from granting an extension of
Page 234.
more than 30 days from the expiration of the time otherwise prescribed to file a notice of appeal. See United States v. Buzard, 884 F.2d 475, 475-76 (9th Cir.1989).
AFFIRMED.