From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Acosta-Licerio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sep 8, 2017
No. CR-16-00478-021-TUC-JGZ (LAB) (D. Ariz. Sep. 8, 2017)

Opinion

No. CR-16-00478-021-TUC-JGZ (LAB)

09-08-2017

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jorge Acosta-Licerio, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Leslie A. Bowman that recommends denying the Defendant Jorge Acosta-Licerio's Motion to Suppress Statements. (Doc. 828.)

A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Bowman's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). // // // //

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Magistrate Judge Bowman's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 828) is accepted and adopted;

2. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements (Doc. 738) is DENIED.

Dated this 8th day of September, 2017.

/s/_________

Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Acosta-Licerio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sep 8, 2017
No. CR-16-00478-021-TUC-JGZ (LAB) (D. Ariz. Sep. 8, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Acosta-Licerio

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jorge Acosta-Licerio, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Sep 8, 2017

Citations

No. CR-16-00478-021-TUC-JGZ (LAB) (D. Ariz. Sep. 8, 2017)