From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Shickler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 2, 1921
199 App. Div. 74 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Opinion

December 2, 1921.

Saperston, McNaughtan Saperston [ Daniel N. McNaughtan of counsel], for the appellants.

Love Keating, for the respondent.


Section 1273 of the Code of Civil Procedure prescribes that "a judgment by confession may be entered, without action, * * * as prescribed in this article." Section 1274 reads: "A written statement must be made, and signed by the defendant, to the following effect." Then follow the provisions as to what the statement must contain. The section then reads: "The statement must be verified by the oath of the defendant, to the effect, that the matters of fact therein set forth are true." Section 1275 provides: "At any time within three years after the statement is verified, it may be filed with the county clerk of the county of which the defendant was a resident at the time of making such statement." The section then provides that the clerk must thereupon enter judgment, etc. These sections are a re-enactment of sections 382, 383 and 384 of the Code of Procedure, in substance.

Since the Code of Procedure went into effect there has never been a case reported in this State, that we have been able to find, where a judgment was entered by confession under a power of attorney except the case of Allen v. Smillie (12 How. Pr. 156). In that case the power of attorney was executed before the Code of Procedure went into effect.

We have been unable to find a case which states that a judgment by confession may be entered in this State under a power of attorney since the Code of Civil Procedure went into effect except the case of Teel v. Yost ( 128 N.Y. 387). The statement of Chief Judge RUGER in that case was obiter dicta, and if he meant to say that at that time a judgment by confession could be entered under a power of attorney, his statement has not been adopted as a correct statement of the law of the State upon that point by any subsequent decision which has been reported, and it has not been so understood by the members of the profession.

The only authority for entering a judgment by confession which existed in this State at the time the judgment in question was entered was contained in the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure above referred to, which required the statement to be signed by the defendant and verified by him and which provided in detail for the facts to be set forth in such statement. No such statement was filed in this case, and the judgment was entered without jurisdiction and should be set aside.

All concur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Shickler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 2, 1921
199 App. Div. 74 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)
Case details for

United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Shickler

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Respondent, v . GEORGE H…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1921

Citations

199 App. Div. 74 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)
191 N.Y.S. 194

Citing Cases

Starck Piano Co. v. O'Keefe

The sources of sections 541 and 542 of the Civil Practice Act are sections 1274 and 1278 of the Code of Civil…

Shenson v. I. Shainin Company, Incorporated

While the judgment may be irregular as to defendants Bernard Shainin and Solomon Shainin, in that the…