From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 10, 2020
19 CIVIL 4029 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 10, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 4029 (JMF)

06-10-2020

UNITED STATES ex rel. JOHN A. WOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLERGAN, INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 10, 2020, in this Court's prior decision, the Court observed that dismissal pursuant to the first-to-file rule may well be "dispositive" because, "[d]uring the six years in which the Government investigated Wood's claims and the case remained under seal, the statute of limitations" continued to run. Wood I, 246 F. Supp. 3d at 793. In fact, that was one of the reasons that, in this Court's view, Wood should be allowed to "cure" his violation of the first-to-file rule by amendment. See id. at 798. But the Second Circuit disagreed and this Court is bound by that ruling. It is also bound by the plain terms of the FCA and the well-established precedent governing whether and when a plaintiff is entitled to equitable tolling. That law compels the Court to conclude that Wood's latest effort to bring FCA claims against Allergan is indeed time barred. Allergan's motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Wood's Complaint is dismissed; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

June 10, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 10, 2020
19 CIVIL 4029 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 10, 2020)
Case details for

United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES ex rel. JOHN A. WOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLERGAN, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 10, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 4029 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 10, 2020)