From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States ex rel. Trenching Servs., Inc. v. Nat'l Sec. Techs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 3, 2013
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00238 MMD-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00238 MMD-VPC

01-03-2013

UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF TRENCHING SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; EAGLE ROCK CONTRACTING, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company; DIAMOND INDEMNITY TRUST 2011-1, a Delaware statutory trust; and DOE-1, Defendants.

Rick R. Hsu, Esq. State Bar No. 5374 Maupin, Cox & LeGoy Attorneys for Plaintiff


Rick R. Hsu, Esq.
State Bar No. 5374
Maupin, Cox & LeGoy
Attorneys for Plaintiff

VOLUNTARY NOTICE OF DISMISSAL,

WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FRCP

RULE 41

VOLUNTARY NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Whereas, Trenching Services, Inc. ("Trenching Services"), a Nevada corporation, commenced this action by filing a Complaint on or about May 2,2012 in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada naming, in part, National Security Technologies, LLC ("NSTec") as a defendant;

Whereas, Trenching Services has not yet served the Complaint on any of the named defendants, and therefore none of the named defendants have entered appearances in this case;

Whereas, Trenching Services and NSTec have entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement to settle fully and finally all differences between them without any admission of liability or fault, including, but not limited to, all claims made by Trenching Services in the above-entitled action;

Whereas, because Trenching Services and NSTec have settled this matter, this action should be voluntarily dismissed;

ACCORDINGLY, THIS CASE IS HEREBY DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY AS FOLLOWS:

All claims filed by Trenching Services in this action against all defendants are dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(i), with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

Respectfully submitted,

MAUPIN, COX & LeGOY

By: ___________

Rick R. Hsu

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Trenching Services,

Inc.

IT IS SO ORDERED

______________________

JUDGE MIRANDA M. DU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States ex rel. Trenching Servs., Inc. v. Nat'l Sec. Techs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 3, 2013
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00238 MMD-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2013)
Case details for

United States ex rel. Trenching Servs., Inc. v. Nat'l Sec. Techs., LLC

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF TRENCHING SERVICES, INC., a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 3, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00238 MMD-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2013)