Opinion
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02449-JAM-GGH
03-07-2013
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF HAROLD E. NUTTER, INC., dba HAROLD E. NUTTER & SON, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. KORTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, dba THE KORTE CO., a Missouri corporation; and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation, Defendants.
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP SEAN P. THOMPSON JOHN W. KLOTSCHE Attorneys for Plaintiff HAROLD E. NUTTER, INC., dba HAROLD E. NUTTER & SON, INC. GREENSFELDER, HEMKER & GALE, PC. MARY ANN L. WYMORE MICHAEL E. WILSON Attorneys for Defendants Korte Construction Company dba The Korte Co. and Travelers Casualty And Surety Company of America
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
SEAN-THOMAS P. THOMPSON, SBN 210529
sthompson@hansonbridgett.com
JOHN W. KLOTSCHE, SBN 257992
jklotsche@hansonbridgett.com
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 442-3333
Facsimile: (916) 442-2348
Attorneys for Plaintiff HAROLD E. NUTTER,
INC., dba HAROLD E. NUTTER & SON, INC.
STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON
KORTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S
MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff Harold E. Nutter, Inc. dba Harold E. Nutter & Son, Inc. ("Nutter"), defendant Korte Construction Company dba The Korte Co. ("Korte") and defendant Travelers Casualty And Surety Company of America ("Travelers") hereby stipulate, through their counsel of record, that the hearing on Korte's Motion To Dismiss currently scheduled for April 3, 2013 be continued to June 5, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, and any opposition or reply papers shall be filed and served pursuant to the timing provisions of Local Rule 230 based on the continued hearing date.
Good cause exists for the approval of this stipulation in that the parties are actively engaged in settlement negotiations that, if successful, could resolve this entire action. Therefore, the parties have stipulated to this continuance so that they may avoid the unnecessary expenditure of legal fees associated with Korte's Motion to Dismiss in the event their settlement efforts are successful.
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
By: ____________________________
SEAN P. THOMPSON
JOHN W. KLOTSCHE
Attorneys for Plaintiff HAROLD E. NUTTER,
INC., dba HAROLD E. NUTTER & SON, INC.
GREENSFELDER, HEMKER & GALE, PC.
By: ____________________________
MARY ANN L. WYMORE
MICHAEL E. WILSON
Attorneys for Defendants Korte Construction
Company dba The Korte Co. and Travelers
Casualty And Surety Company of America
IT IS SO ORDERED:
John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE