From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States America v. Marshall

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 3, 1992
976 F.2d 658 (11th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-8141.

November 3, 1992.

Bruce Maloy, Maloy Jenkins, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

James T. Martin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Marvin H. Schoob, Judge.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY and COX, Circuit Judges.


We find it proper to include the defendant when counting the individuals involved in the criminal activity. United States v. Schweihs, 971 F.2d 1302 (7th Cir. 1992); United States v. Harry, 960 F.2d 51, 53 (8th Cir. 1992); United States v. Fells, 920 F.2d 1179, 1182 (4th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2831, 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991); United States v. Reid, 911 F.2d 1456, 1464 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 990, 112 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991); United States v. Barbontin, 907 F.2d 1494, 1498 (5th Cir. 1990); United States v. Preakos, 907 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir. 1990).

We find no merit in the other issues raised in this appeal.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States America v. Marshall

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 3, 1992
976 F.2d 658 (11th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

United States America v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ERNEST MARSHALL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 1992

Citations

976 F.2d 658 (11th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Hall

We need not reach this argument because the upward adjustment is fully supported by the district court's…