From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Security Corporation v. Suchman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1953
282 App. Div. 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Summary

In United Security Corp. v. Suchman (282 App. Div. 661, 760) two Judges in the Appellate Division, First Department, voted to reverse the determination of the Appellate Term. Leave to appeal was granted and the case went to the Court of Appeals (306 N.Y. 858), where a motion to dismiss was granted unless a stipulation for order absolute was filed.

Summary of this case from Tai On Luck Corp. v. Cirota

Opinion

June 9, 1953.

Present — Peck, P.J. Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.;


Determination affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion.


Callahan and Bergan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the determination of the Appellate Term and reinstate the intermediate and final orders of the Municipal Court for the reasons assigned in the opinion of EDER, J., at the Appellate Term. [See post, p. 760.]


Summaries of

United Security Corporation v. Suchman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 9, 1953
282 App. Div. 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

In United Security Corp. v. Suchman (282 App. Div. 661, 760) two Judges in the Appellate Division, First Department, voted to reverse the determination of the Appellate Term. Leave to appeal was granted and the case went to the Court of Appeals (306 N.Y. 858), where a motion to dismiss was granted unless a stipulation for order absolute was filed.

Summary of this case from Tai On Luck Corp. v. Cirota
Case details for

United Security Corporation v. Suchman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED SECURITY CORPORATION, Respondent, v. ISADORE SUCHMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Tai On Luck Corp. v. Cirota

The Appellate Division, Second Department ( 273 App. Div. 823), unanimously affirmed the judgment without…