From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Resources v. City Natl. Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 28, 1980
380 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 78-1912.

January 22, 1980. Rehearing Denied March 28, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Francis J. Christie, J.

Bailey Dawes and Sara Soto, Miami, for appellants.

Podhurst, Orseck Parks and Joel D. Eaton, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON and SCHWARTZ, JJ., and EZELL, BOYCE, F., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.


The defendants in a mortgage foreclosure suit appeal that portion of the judgment which allowed the plaintiff an attorney's fee. It is argued that the fee is excessive for the time spent by the plaintiff's attorney on the cause. The defendants offered no evidence at the hearing on the fee, and the amount of the fee is supported by the expert testimony. We will not reverse an order allowing a fee under such circumstances absent a showing of a gross abuse of discretion appearing from other factors in the record. See Snider v. Snider, 375 So.2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). No such showing has been made. Cf. Molne v. Keyes Co., 357 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United Resources v. City Natl. Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 28, 1980
380 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

United Resources v. City Natl. Bank

Case Details

Full title:UNITED RESOURCES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, COUNTRY CLUB OF MIAMI…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 28, 1980

Citations

380 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

GENERAL ACC. FIRE LIFE v. AM. CAS

The trial court acted within its discretion. United Resources v. City National Bank of Miami, 380 So.2d 1060…