From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United Prescription Services, Inc. v. Gonzalez

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
May 23, 2007
Case No: 8:07-CV-316-T-30MAP (M.D. Fla. May. 23, 2007)

Opinion

Case No: 8:07-CV-316-T-30MAP.

May 23, 2007


ORDER


THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo (Dkt. #18). The Court notes that Plaintiff timely filed Written Objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. #19). Defendants have not filed a Reply to the Objections and the time for doing so has elapsed.

After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects.

ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #18) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review.

2. The Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. #2) filed on February 20, 2007, is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

United Prescription Services, Inc. v. Gonzalez

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
May 23, 2007
Case No: 8:07-CV-316-T-30MAP (M.D. Fla. May. 23, 2007)
Case details for

United Prescription Services, Inc. v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED PRESCRIPTION SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff(s), v. ALBERTO R. GONZALEZ…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: May 23, 2007

Citations

Case No: 8:07-CV-316-T-30MAP (M.D. Fla. May. 23, 2007)

Citing Cases

Miller Pharmacy Servs. v. U.S. Drug Enf't Admin.

5 U.S.C. § 701, et seq; Cardinal Health, Inc. v. Holder 846 F.Supp.2d 203, 214 (D.D.C. 2012) United…

Evergreen Pharmacy, Inc. v. Garland

As courts have recognized, the arbitrary and capricious standard of review applies to APA claims challenging…