From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Unit. Babt. Ch., Prim. Faith, Pop. Spgs. v. Gautney

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 19, 1948
34 So. 2d 1 (Ala. 1948)

Opinion

8 Div. 414.

February 19, 1948.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; J. S. Stone, Judge.

Marion F. Lusk, of Guntersville, for appellant.

It was proper to present the question of res judicata by demurrer since the nature and scope of the earlier decree was fully set forth in the bill. 13 Alabama Digest, Judgment, 948(2). The questions now sought to be revived and again decided have already been fully litigated between the same parties, and no fraud or irregularity in the making of the former decree is alleged. Williams v. Williams, 202 Ala. 539, 81 So. 41; Crowson v. Cody, 215 Ala. 150, 110 So. 46; 101 A.L.R. 1326. The bill shows appellees are bound by the former decree and are estopped from assailing same collaterally. Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co., 222 Ala. 155, 131 So. 14.

J. A. Johnson, of Fort Payne, for appellees.

The original writ of injunction should not have been granted. Tucker v. Denson, 202 Ala. 308, 80 So. 373; Manning v. Yeager, 203 Ala. 185, 82 So. 435; Skyline M. B. Church v. Davis, 245 Ala. 455, 17 So.2d 533. The time had not elapsed and complainants were not estopped from filing this suit, they having three years from the date of the original decree for a review, or to vacate said decree. Equity Rule 66, Code 1940, Tit. 7, p. 1099; Smith v. Smith, 243 Ala. 488, 10 So.2d 664; McDonald v. Pearson, 114 Ala. 630, 21 So. 534; Graves v. Brittingham, 209 Ala. 147, 95 So. 542.


On September 10, 1947, B. F. Gautney and others (appellees) filed the bill of complaint in this cause against United Baptist Church of Primitive Faith and Order at Poplar Springs (appellant) for the purpose of setting aside or modifying a decree which had been previously rendered on February 21, 1945, in the same court between the same parties and about the same subject matter. A church and church property at Poplar Springs in Marshall County, Alabama, was the subject matter of the first suit and is the subject matter of the present proceeding.

A copy of the decree in the first suit is attached to the present bill and is made a part thereof. That decree declares that United Baptist Church of the Primitive Faith and Order at Poplar Springs has been a church association since 1881 and has at all times continuously exercised its powers and privileges and since acquiring the church property in 1900 has at all times enjoyed the uninterrupted and undisturbed use of the property. That decree then made permanent a prior temporary injunction, forever enjoining B. F. Gautney and others (appellees here) from going on the property for conducting services of any nature or character or for use of the property for any purpose.

The present bill of complaint alleges the following as grounds for relief: "* * * said decree is very far reaching and working a great handicap, and much inconvenience and hardships on the complainants, causing them embarrassment and restraining them from the worship of God and the burial of their families, and in all said decree is now an injustice to these people, and should be now replaced and the injunction dissolved, or greatly modified so that justice can be done and these people live in peace and not have their liberties taken away from them."

Appellant demurred to the bill on the grounds that it affirmatively appears from the bill that the matters complained of have already been adjudicated between the parties, that complainants are estopped to assail the earlier decree and that there is no equity in the bill. The court overruled the demurrer. This appeal is from that decree.

The earlier decree rendered on November 21, 1945, was set forth in the bill of complaint. Accordingly the question of res adjudicata was properly raised by demurrer. Crowson v. Cody, 215 Ala. 150, 110 So. 46; Williams v. Williams, 202 Ala. 539, 81 So. 41. The questions now sought to be reviewed and again decided have already been fully litigated between the same parties and are now res adjudicata. Authorities supra. No fraud or irregularity in the rendition of the decree of November 21, 1945, is alleged. The bill falls far short of being a bill of review or a bill in the nature of a bill of review. Rochelle v. Rochelle, 237 Ala. 530, 187 So. 451; Winkleman v. White, 147 Ala. 481, 42 So. 411; Cowdy v. Hood, 248 Ala. 635, 29 So.2d 121. On the averments of the present bill of complaint, the parties who are the appellees here are estopped from attacking collaterally in this suit the decree of November 21, 1945. Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co., 222 Ala. 155, 131 So. 14.

It is not out of place to say that courts interfere in church matters only to preserve and determine property rights. Caples et al. v. Nazareth Church of Hopewell Ass'n, 245 Ala. 656, 18 So.2d 383.

The demurrer to the bill of complaint should be sustained and a decree is here rendered to that effect. Thirty days from this date is allowed for amendment.

Reversed, rendered and remanded.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Unit. Babt. Ch., Prim. Faith, Pop. Spgs. v. Gautney

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 19, 1948
34 So. 2d 1 (Ala. 1948)
Case details for

Unit. Babt. Ch., Prim. Faith, Pop. Spgs. v. Gautney

Case Details

Full title:UNITED BAPTIST CHURCH OF PRIMITIVE FAITH AND ORDER AT POPLAR SPRINGS v…

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Feb 19, 1948

Citations

34 So. 2d 1 (Ala. 1948)
34 So. 2d 1

Citing Cases

Yates v. El Bethel Primitive Baptist Church

131 Ala. at 244, 32 So. at 578-79 (quoting Shannon v. Frost, 42 Ky. (3 B. Mon.) 253 (1842)). See also Davis…

Murphy v. Traylor

As a starting point, the court has repeatedly held that while the powers of courts of this state may not be…